(Download) "Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co." by The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio " eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free
eBook details
- Title: Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.
- Author : The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio
- Release Date : January 26, 1986
- Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 65 KB
Description
This case requires us to determine the circumstances in which an attorneys pro hac vice admission can be revoked by a trial court. Attorneys admitted in other states, but not in Ohio, may request permission from the court to appear pro hac vice. The decision of whether to permit representation by out-of-state counsel in an Ohio court is a matter within the discretion of the trial court. State v. Ross (1973), 36 Ohio App.2d 185 [65 O.O.2d 316]; D. H. Overmyer Co. v. Robson (C.A. 6, 1984), 750 F. 2d 31. Out-of-state lawyers have no absolute right under state or federal law to practice in Ohio. Leis v. Flynt (1979), 439 U.S. 438 [11 O.O.3d 302]. Furthermore, once pro hac vice status is extended, a trial court retains the power to revoke the status. This is part of the courts inherent power to regulate the practice before it and protect the integrity osits proceedings. D. H. Overmyer Co. v. Robson, supra; Smith v. Brock (Okla. 1975), 532 P. 2d 843.